Due diligence before buying commercial property should cover more than an extract from the Unified State Register of Real Estate (EGRN). The buyer should review the property itself, its title history, the seller, encumbrances, tenants, litigation, alterations, engineering systems and the building's operating arrangements.
For an office in a business centre, additional questions arise: who owns the parking spaces, what rules the management company imposes, whether the required fit-out is permitted and whether there is enough engineering capacity for the future team.
In short, three areas should be checked before buying commercial premises:
Below is a detailed checklist for reviewing an office before a transaction.
This material is for information only. For a high-value commercial property transaction, it is advisable to have a real-estate specialist carry out the legal review of the documents and contract.
If time is limited, start with these points:
A serious issue at any stage does not necessarily mean that the transaction must be abandoned. However, the risk should be understood before any money is paid, not after title is registered.
An extract from the Unified State Register of Real Estate is one of the key documents used to review a property.
Among other things, it can be used to verify:
However, the EGRN does not answer every question.
For example, an extract alone will not fully reveal:
The EGRN is therefore the starting point for due diligence, not the entire review.
The first step may seem obvious, but this is where mistakes often begin.
Cross-check:
A transaction involving a large office may include more than one registered property.
Separate legal status may apply to:
The statement “everything is included in the price” should therefore be supported by a list of the properties and documents.
It is essential to understand exactly what the buyer will acquire once the transaction is registered.
Do not rely solely on an extract supplied by the seller several months earlier.
Rosreestr notes that the law does not set a fixed validity period for an EGRN extract. The information reflects the register as it stood when the extract was issued.
For a major transaction, it is therefore prudent to obtain current information as close as possible to the signing date.
Check the following in the extract:
Cross-check:
If the actual office differs materially from the register, establish why.
Make sure the seller has registered title to the property being sold.
If a representative signs the agreement, their authority must be checked separately.
Pay particular attention to information on:
An encumbrance does not always make a transaction impossible, but the buyer should understand how it will be discharged or the consequences if it remains after title passes.
Identifying the current owner is not enough.
You need to understand how title arose.
The basis may be:
Extra care is required if the property:
The higher the property's value, the more important it is to reconstruct its transaction history as far back as necessary to assess the risk.
Frequent changes of ownership do not in themselves prove that there is a problem.
They do, however, justify further questions.
For example:
If the chain of title looks unusual, the property's legal history should be examined in more detail.
If the seller is a legal entity, reviewing the property itself is only half the task.
The company must also be reviewed.
For an initial review, use the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (EGRUL) and the Federal Tax Service's Transparent Business service.
Check:
For a major transaction, a lawyer will also review the seller's charter and corporate documents.
The fact that the person is presented as the general director does not complete the review.
Establish:
If a representative signs under a power of attorney, check:
In a high-value property transaction, a formal defect in the signatory's authority is an unnecessary risk.
The owner's financial position requires separate attention.
A property sale by a company in serious financial difficulty may later be challenged.
For an initial review, use:
Take particular care where several warning signs appear together:
The buyer's task is not merely to establish that the company exists today, but to identify circumstances that could later call the transaction into question.
Searching for the seller in the Commercial Court Case File helps reveal the nature of the company's litigation.
The mere existence of court proceedings is not conclusive. For a large company, multiple cases may be a normal part of business.
The subject matter of each dispute is what matters.
Pay particular attention to:
If the office being acquired, or a related right, features in litigation, the transaction requires especially careful analysis.
Commercial property may be sold subject to existing leases.
Request information on every agreement relating to the premises.
You need to understand:
This is particularly important if a company is buying the office for its own use.
An existing tenant may mean that the buyer cannot occupy the premises immediately after completion.
For an investment buyer, the position is different: a reliable sitting tenant may be an advantage, but the lease economics must be reviewed separately.
Premises with a clear legal history may still have technical problems.
Obtain an up-to-date plan and compare it with the office as built.
Check:
If the actual condition differs, establish:
Premises that have undergone major refurbishment or a complex fit-out require particular scrutiny.
Our article explains in detail what work is involved in the comprehensive preparation of a space: “Office fit-out: what it is, stages, timeframes and cost”.
A lawyer checks legal rights, but cannot determine whether the office has enough ventilation for the intended team.
For a large property, legal due diligence should preferably be supplemented by a technical audit.
Confirm:
This is especially important for:
Check:
An empty office may feel comfortable during a viewing but perform very differently once the team moves in.
Assess:
Inspect:
The cost of remedying identified defects should be included in the financial model before the transaction.
An office buyer acquires the premises but remains dependent on the building in which they are located.
Before the transaction, request:
Find out separately whether any amounts are owed to the management company in respect of the premises and what obligations the new owner will assume.
We explain the structure of recurring charges in detail in “Office operating expenses: what OPEX includes”.
The phrase “parking comes with the office” is too vague for a high-value transaction.
Establish:
If parking spaces form part of the commercial offer, they should be reviewed as carefully as the main office.
For example, when acquiring office penthouse F-375 the offer includes 15 parking spaces. Their inclusion and legal status should be reviewed together with the main property.
A legally sound transaction may still be economically unattractive.
In addition to the purchase price, consider:
When comparing two offices, a modest difference in purchase price may matter less than future refurbishment costs.
If the company has not yet decided whether to buy or lease, it is useful first to compare buying and leasing an office in Moscow City.
An excessively high price is a financial risk.
An unusually low price is a reason to ask further questions.
A material departure from comparable properties may reflect:
Price alone does not prove that there is a problem. However, the buyer should understand the reason for a material discount and how it fits the overall transaction.
Make sure the premises' legal status is consistent with the intended use.
For a corporate office, the following are particularly important:
Adjacent premises in a mixed-use complex may have different legal status.
The designated use of a particular property cannot therefore be inferred merely from its location in a well-known office tower.
Even if the current office is legally and technically sound, it may not suit the future owner.
It is advisable to prepare a test layout before buying.
Map out:
A technical specialist should then determine whether the proposed layout can be implemented.
The property can be assessed before the transaction using the process in our guide “How to Choose an Office in Moscow City”.
The agreement should not be treated as a formality once the property review is complete.
At a minimum, the document should clearly identify:
Seller representations are also important in a complex commercial transaction.
For example, the parties may record statements that:
The exact terms depend on the transaction structure and should be reviewed by a lawyer.
Inspect the property again before signing the handover certificate.
Record:
If time passes between signing the agreement and physical handover, the condition of the premises may change.
The certificate is therefore the final control point.
A high-rise office in a mixed-use complex has additional considerations.
In addition to standard legal due diligence, review:
Confirm which lift bank serves the floor and how access is arranged for staff and visitors.
A high-rise building has centralised systems, and not every alteration can be carried out independently within the office.
Obtain the technical requirements and operating rules before developing the proposed design.
Check what work is permitted and how approvals are obtained.
Do not treat parking spaces as part of the transaction until the documents confirm this.
A premium office should be compared not only by price per square metre, but also by its ongoing operating costs.
The broader transaction process is explained in our guide “How to buy an office in Moscow City”.
A single sign does not necessarily mean that the transaction is problematic. A combination of circumstances should raise concern.
The reasons for the title transfers should be investigated.
The commercial reason for the discount should be clear.
A serious warning sign, however attractive the price.
The legal status of the alterations must be established before the transaction.
Especially where the disputes concern property, creditors or bankruptcy.
The mechanism for removing the restriction should be legally clear and controllable.
Verbal assurances about parking spaces are no substitute for documents.
It may materially change the economics of ownership.
Such a problem may be much harder to resolve after purchase than before it.
Obtain the cadastral numbers and a complete list of everything included in the offer.
Check the characteristics, rights and restrictions.
Obtain the documents under which the current owner holds title.
Review the EGRUL records, management, shareholders or members, and financial warning signs.
Check the Commercial Court Case File and Fedresurs.
Start with leases and other third-party rights.
Identify any unapproved alterations.
Review the engineering systems, capacity and physical condition of the office.
Include OPEX, parking, fit-out and other future costs.
Record the property, price, payment arrangements, party representations and condition of the premises.
The buyer can collect some initial information independently:
For a major transaction, however, it is prudent to divide responsibilities.
A lawyer reviews:
A technical specialist reviews:
A financial specialist assesses:
The more valuable the office, the less convincing the argument for saving money on due diligence.
Before buying commercial premises, more than title alone must be checked.
A comprehensive review covers:
For a high-value corporate office, legal and technical due diligence should proceed in parallel.
This allows the buyer to understand not only whether the property can legally be acquired, but also whether the company will be able to use it as intended after purchase.
If a company is considering buying its own headquarters in Federation Tower, details of the three-level office penthouse F-375 can be found on the main project page.
Start with the EGRN information, title documents, seller information, existing encumbrances and agreements relating to the property. The list may be considerably longer for a particular transaction.
Start with the EGRN information and the seller's documents. If the owner is a legal entity, also check its EGRUL records, the director's authority and corporate documents.
The law does not set a universal validity period. Since an extract reflects the register when it was issued, it is advisable to obtain the most up-to-date document available before a major transaction.
Registered restrictions and encumbrances are checked in the EGRN. A lawyer will also review the property documents, agreements and litigation.
For an initial review, use the EGRUL, the Federal Tax Service's Transparent Business service, Fedresurs and the Commercial Court Case File. Corporate documents and financial condition should also be examined for a major transaction.
Yes. The office as built should be compared with the technical and registration documents. Any discrepancies must be assessed before the transaction.
In addition to the premises' legal status, check the management company, operating expenses, engineering capacity, fit-out rules, access, parking and terms for using shared building systems.
No. Due diligence aims to identify material risks, assess their likelihood and give the buyer a basis for making a decision. A high-value transaction should be reviewed comprehensively by relevant specialists.